题目内容（请给出正确答案）

[主观题]

What are two merits of having a correct time setting on each WX/WXC device in a community？（）（Choose two.)

A. Ensures connectivity to the registration server.

B. Allows WX devices to synchronize with one another.

C. Helps in the maintenance of WX devices using WX CMS.

D. Generates accurate and consistent monitoring reports.

查看答案

如搜索结果不匹配，请联系老师获取答案

您可能会需要：

重置密码查看订单联系客服

安装赏学吧APP，拍照搜题省时又省心！

更多“What are two merits of having …”相关的问题

第1题

What are the merits and limitations of the Total Physical Response？What are the merits and limitations of the Total Physical Response？

点击查看答案

第2题

One important thing during the pre-Christmas rush at our house was the arrival of my daughter's kindergarten report card. She got 01 praise for her reading, vocabulary and overall enthusiasm. On the other hand, we 02 that she has work to do on her numbers and facility with the computer, though the detailed 03 report her teachers prepared is absent of any words that might be interpreted as negative in describing her 04 . A number system indicates how she's measuring up in each area 05 any mention of passing or failing.

All of 06 seems to make my daughter’s school neither fish nor fowl when 07 comes to the debate over the merits of giving formal grades to kids. At one 08 , the advantages and disadvantages are obvious. A grade system provides a straightforward 09 by which to measure how your child is progressing at school —— and how he or she is getting 10 compared to other children.

But as writer Sue Ferguson notes, “Grades can deceive,” The aim should be "to measure learning, not 11 what a student can recall on a test. ” The two aren’t the same — and if you doubt that as an adult, ask yourself whether you could sit down 12 any preparation and still pass those high-school-level examinations.

If you're old 13 , you've lived through this debate before. At one time, it was considered unfair to put children in direct competition with one another if it could be avoided. The intention 14 that may have been good, but it ignored the fact that competition, and the 15 to come out on top, are essential components of the human condition.

This time around, educators working with a no-grades approach are emphasizing different reasons. The thing is, that approach is much more 16 in the adult workplace than is the traditional pass-fail system we place on our children. Many workplaces 17 regular employee evaluations. There are usually fairly strict limits to what an employer can tell an employee in those evaluations — and even then, negative evaluations can be 18 by the employee. No matter 19 you sit in the debate over the grade system, then, the real question is this: if it's so good for kids, why isn't that also true for 20 ?

(1)

Ahigher

Bhighly

Chighest

Dhigh

(2)

Astudy

Blearn

Clearnt

Dstudied

(3)

Ahandwritten

Bhandwrite

Chandwrote

Dhandwriting

(4)

Aeffects

Baffects

Cefforts

Daffords

(5)

Awide

Bwithout

Cwith

Dwidth

(6)

Awhen

Bwhere

Cwhich

Dhow

(7)

Ahe

Bshe

Cthey

Dit

(8)

Astage

Bextent

Clevel

Dfloor

(9)

Atradition

Bregular

Cuniqueness

Dstandard

(10)

Ain

Bto

Cup

Don

(11)

Ahumbly

Bsimply

Ceasily

Dreally

(12)

Awithout

Bnear

Cwith

Dnearly

(13)

Aenough

Bdecent

Csufficient

Dnearly

(14)

Abehind

Bbefore

Cbeside

Dbesides

(15)

Ashould

Bwill

Cwould

Dshall

(16)

Acommonplace

Bshould

Cmarketplace

Ddisplace

(17)

Adrop

Bleave

Cabandon

Dconduct

(18)

Aaccepted

Bsupported

Cchallenged

Dexplained

(19)

Awhy

Bwhere

Cwho

Dwhat

(20)

Afathers

Bmothers

Ckids

Dadults。

点击查看答案

第3题

Cooperative competition. Competitive cooperation. Confused？ Airline alliances have travele

rs scratching their heads over what' s going on in the skies. Some folks view alliances as a blessing to travelers, offering seamless travel, reduced fares and enhanced frequent-flyer benefits. Others see a conspiracy of big business, causing decreased competition, increased fares and fewer choices. Whatever your opinion, there' s no escaping airline alliances: the marketing hype is unrelenting, with each of the two mega-groupings. One world and Star Alliance, promoting itself as the best choice for all travelers. And, even if you turn away from their ads, chances are they will figure in any of your travel plans. By the end of the year, one world and Star Alliance will between them control more than 40% of the traffic in the sky. Some pundits predict that figure will be more like 75% in 10 years.

But why, after years of often ferocious competition, have airlines decided to band together？ Let' s just say the timing is mutually convenient. North American airlines, having exhausted all means of earning customer loyalty at home, have been looking for ways to reach out to foreign flyers. Asian carriers are still burring from the region-wide economic downturn that began two years ago— just when some of the airlines were taking delivery of new aircraft. Alliances also allow carriers to cut costs and increase profits by pooling manpower resources on the ground (rather than each airline maintaining its own ground crew) and code-sharing--the practice of two partners selling tickets and operating only one aircraft.

So alliances are terrific for airlines, but are they good for the passenger？ Absolutely, say the airlines: think to the lounges, the joint FFP (frequent flyer programme) benefits, the round-the- world fares, and the global service networks. Then there' s the promise of "seamless" travel: the ability to, say, travel form. Singapore to Rome to New York to Rio de Janiero, all on one ticket, without having to wait hours for connections or worry about your bags. Sounds utopian？ Peter Buecking, Cathay Pacific' s director of sales and marketing, thinks that seamless travel is still evolving. "It's fair to say that these links are only in their infancy. The key to seamlessness rests in infrastructure and information sharing. We' re working on this." Henry Ma, spokesperson for Star Alliance in Hong Kong, lists stone of the other benefits for consumers: "Global travelers have an easier time making connections and planning their itineraries." Ma claims alliances also assure passengers consistent service standards.

Critics of alliances say the much-touted benefits to the consumer are mostly pie in the sky, that alliances are all about reducing costs for the airlines, rationalizing services and running joint marketing programmes. Jeff Blyskal, associate editor of Consumer Reports magazine, says the promotional ballyhoo over alliances is much ado about nothing. "I don' t see much of a gain for consumers: alliances are just a marketing gimmick. And as far as seamless travel goes, I' II believe it when I see it. Most airlines can ' t even get their own connections under control, let alone coordinate with another airline."

Blyskal believes alliances will ultimately result in decreased flight choices and increased costs for consumers. Instead of two airlines competing and each operating a flight on the same route at 70% capacity, the allied pair will share the route and ran one full flight. Since fewer seats will be available, passengers will be obliged to pay more for tickets.

The truth about alliances and their merits probably lies somewhere between the travel utopia presented by the players and the evil empires portrayed by their critics. And how much they affect you depends on what kind of traveler you are.

Those who h

A．Delight.

B．Indifference.

C．Objection.

D．Puzzlement.

点击查看答案

第4题

Cooperative competition. Competitive cooperation. Confused？ Airline alliances have travell

ers scratching their heads over what's going on in the skies. Some folks view alliances as a blessing to travellers, offering seamless travel, reduced fares and enhanced frequent-flyer benefits. Others see a conspiracy of big businesses, causing decreased competition, increased fares and fewer choices. Whatever your opinion, there's no escaping airline alliances: the marketing hype is unrelenting, with each of the two mega-groupings, Oneworld and Star Alliance, promoting itself as the best choice for all travellers. And, even if you turn away from their ads, chances are they will figure in any of your travel plans. By the end of the year, Oneworld and Star Alliance will between them control more than 40% of the traffic in the sky. Some pundits predict that figure will be more like 75% in 10 years.

But why, after years of often ferocious competition, have airlines decided to band together？ Let's just say the timing is mutually convenient. North American airlines, having exhausted all means of earning customer loyalty at home, have been looking for ways to reach oat to foreign flyers. Asian carders are still hurling from the region-wide economic downturn that began two years ago--just when some of the airlines were taking delivery of new aircraft. Alliances also allow carriers to cut coots and increase profits by pooling manpower resources on the ground (rather than each airline maintaining its own ground crew) and code-sharing--the practice of two partners selling tickets and operating only one aircraft.

So alliances are terrific for airlines--but are they good for the passenger？ Absolutely, say the airlines: think of the lounges, the joint FFP (frequent flyer programme) benefits, the round-the-world fares, and the global service networks. Then there's the promise of "seamless" travel: the ability to, say, travel from Singapore to Rome to New York to Rio de Janiero, all on one ticket, without having to wait hours for connections or worry about your bags. Sounds utopian？ Peter Buecking, Cathay Pacific's director of sales and marketing, thinks that seamless travel is still evolving. "It's fair to say that these links are only in their infancy. The key to seamlessness rests in infrastructure and information sharing. We're working on this. "Henry Ma, spokesperson for Star Alliance in Hong Kong, lists some of the other benefits for consumers: "Global travellers have an easier time making connections and planning their itineraries." Ma claims alliances also assure passengers consistent service standards. Critics of alliances say the much-touted benefits to the consumer are mostly pie in the sky, that alliances are all about reducing costs for the airlines, rationalizing services and running joint marketing programmes. Jeff Blyskal, associate editor of Consumer Reports magazine, says the promotional ballyhoo over alliances is much ado about nothing. "I don't see much of a gain for consumers: alliances are just a marketing gimmick. And as far as seamless travel goes, I'll believe it when I see it. Most airlines can't even get their own connections under control, let alone coordinate with another airline."

Blyskal believes alliances will ultimately result in decreased flight choices and increased costs for consumers. Instead of two airlines competing and each operating a flight on the same route at 70% capacity, the allied pair will share the route and run one full flight. Since fewer seats will be available, passengers will be obliged to pay more for tickets.

Those who've already made the elite grade in the FFP of a major airline stand to benefit the most when it

A．Delight.

B．Indifference.

C．Objection.

D．Puzzlement.

点击查看答案

第5题

What are the two basic ways to organize a resume？

点击查看答案

第6题

What would youlike sir？ B:________

A.Two cups of coflees