The issue related to taxes will be ()in accordance with the taxation laws in China.
A、dealt
B、dealt in
C、dealt to
D、dealt with
如搜索结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“The issue related to taxes wil…”相关的问题
第1题
A.related
B.reality
C.relation
D.relatives
第2题
A.You may cite a well-known quotation from a public figur
B.You may tell a short story.
C.You may first present the essay's thesis statement.
D.You may start with a comment on a public issue related to your topi
第3题
One possible version:
The traffic issue is a hard nut to crack. It not only affects our everyday life， but may alsothreaten people’s ives. The three selections presented above are typical examples.
Quite a few things give rise to the traffic problem. In spite of the large-scale construction ofroads and highways， there is still much room for improvement， because of the ever increasing
number of cars these years. What爷s worse， some drivers， cyclists and pedestrians do not think it vital to obey traffic rules.
In fact， traffic rules are part of the rules and regulations closely related to public order. Withoutthem， people could not enjoy harmony or the country would be in chaos. But rules alone don’tsecure an orderly society. It is the people who obey the rules that matter. It is everybody’s duty toobserve them to keep our society in order and going on the right track.
（150 words）
第4题
A.‘pc‘ refers to the number of physical processors consumed, while ‘ec‘ refers to the percentage of entitled capacity consumed.
B.‘pc‘ refers to the ‘physical CPUs‘ and lists how many are left un-allocated, while ec‘ refers to the ‘entitled CPUs‘ and lists what amount is currently allocated to the LPAR.
C.‘pc‘ refers to the ‘processor count‘ and reflects how many CPUs are allocated to the LPAR, while ‘ec ‘ refers to the ‘extra capacity‘ and lists how much above the LPAR entitlement is being consumed.
D.‘pc‘ refers to ‘processor cards‘ and reflects how many MCM modules are actually being used by this LPAR, while ‘ec‘ refers to the ‘entitled CPUs‘and lists what amount is currently allocated to the LPAR.
第5题
根据下面材料，回答第 31～35 题：
In 2010. a federal judge shook America's biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by 2005 some 20% of human genes were parented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organisation (BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a “preliminary step” in a longer battle.
On July 29th they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman's risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Myriad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.
But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it; and patents' monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad's. A growing number seem to agree. Last year a federal task-force urged reform. for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule “is no less a product of nature... than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds.”
Despite the appeals court's decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.
AS the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules - most are already patented or in the public domain .firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for ‘connecting the dots’, explains Hans Sauer, a lawyer for the BIO.
Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents. Each meeting was packed.
第 31 题 It can be learned from paragraph I that the biotech companies would like______
A．their executives to be active
B．judges to rule out gene patenting
C．genes to be patentable
D．the BIO to issue a warning
第6题
请根据下面的信用证以及补充资料，填写出口货物许可证。
NATIONAL PARIS BANK
24 MARSHAL AVE DONCASTER MONTREAL， CANADA
WE ISSUE OUR IRREVOCABLE DOCUMENTARY CREDIT NUMBER: QQ2011 IN FAVOUR OF:
SHANGHAI KNITWEAR AND MANUFACTURE GOODS IMPORT AND EXPORT TRADECORPORATION.
321， CHONGSHAN ROAD SHANGHAI， CHINA
BY ORDER OF: YI YANG TRADING CORPORATION
88 MARSHAL AVE
DONCASTER VIC 3108
CANADA
FOR AN AMOUNT OF USD89 705.00
DATE AND PLACE OF ISSUE: SEPT. 18th， 2011 MONTREAL
DATE OF EXPIRY: NOV 15， 2011
PLACE: IN BENEFICARY’S COUNTRY
BY NEGOTIATION OF BENEFICIARY'S DRAFT DRAWN ON US AT SIGHT IN MONTREAL
THIS CREDIT IS TRANSFERABLE
AGAINST DELIVERY OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS
+ COMMERCIAL INVOICES IN 3 COPIES.
+ CANADA CUSTOMS INVOICES IN 3 COPIES.
+ FULL SET OF NEGOTIABLE INSURANCE POLICY OR CERTIFICATE BLANK ENDORSEDFOR 110 PERCENT OF INVOICE VALUE COVERING ALL RISKS.
+ FULL SET OF ORIGINAL MARINE BILLS OF LADING CLEAN ON BOARD PLUS 2NON-NEGOTIABLE COPIES MADE OUT OR ENDORSED TO ORDER OF NATIONAL PARISBANK 24 MARSHAL AVE DONCASTER MONTREAL， CANADA.
+ SPECIFICATION LIST OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES IN 4 COPIES COVERING SHIPMENTOF COTTON TEA TOWELS.
AS PER S/C M-N808
FOR 1-300 SIZE 10 INCHES*10 INCHES 16 000 DOZAT USD1.31/DOZ.
301-600 SIZE 20 INCHES*20 INCHES 6000 DOZ AT USD2.51/DOZ.
601-900 SIZE 30 INCHES*30 INCHES 11 350 DOZ AT USD4.73/DOZ.
CIF MONTREAL
FROM SHANGHAI TO MONTREAL PORT
NOT LATER THAN OCT.31TH， 2011
PARTIAL SHIPMENTS: ALLOWED
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
+ ALL CHARGES IF ANY RELATED TO SETTLEMENTS ARE FOR ACCOUNT OFBENEFICIARY.
+ 1N CASE OF PRESENTATION OF DOCUMENTS WITH DISCREPANCY (IES) A CHARGE OFUSD 55.00 THIS CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO UCP DOCUMENTARY CREDITS (2007 REVISION)ICC PUBLICATION 600．
第7题
第三篇
A Debate on the English Language
A measure declaring English the national language is under intense debate in the United States.The US Senate passed two declarations last week.One calls English the nation's official language and the other says it is the “common and unifying（统一的）”tongue.But Americans found themselves divided on the issue.
Since people worldwide know that most Americans speak only English,many can't understand why the issue is so controversial（有争议的）.
“The discussion is related to fears of immigration issues,”says Dick Tucker,a social scientist at Pittsburgh's Carnegie Mellon University.“It's related to a worry about the changing demography（人口统计）of the US.It's a worry about who will continue to have political and economic influence.”报关员考试
In fact,the notion of protecting the language has been kicked around almost since the nation's founding.John Adams lobbied（游说）in 1780 for the creation of a national academy to correct and improve the English language.But his proposal died,since lawmakers saw it as a royalist（保皇主义者）attempt to define personal behavior.
Since then,the country hasn't had a national language,but the idea of recognizing the special status of English lived on.
The emotions surrounding language resurface（再次浮现）not because people feel comfortable with English.It is more about the discomfort many Americans feel with the new languages,says Walt Wolfram,a professor at North Carolina State University.
“Language is never about language,”he says.
According to the 2000 US Census Bureau report,of 209 million Americans over 18 years old,172 million speak only English at home.About 37 million speak languages other than English.Among them,6.5 million speak poor English and 3.1 million don't speak English at all.
41.What are the two declarations concerned with？
A.The status of the English language.
B.The protection of new languages.
C.The rights to speak one's mother tongue.
D.The improvement of the English language.
第8题
A Debate on the English Language
A measure declaring English the national language is under intense debate in the United States. The US Senate passed two declarations last week. One calls English the nation's official language and the other says it is the “common and unifying(统一的)”tongue. But Americans found themselves divided on the issue.
Since people worldwide know that most Americans speak only English, many can't understand why the issue is so controversial(有争议的).
“The discussion is related to fears of immigration issues,” says Dick Tucker, a social scientist at Pittsburgh's Carnegie Mellon University. “It's related to a worry about the changing demography(人口统计)of the US. It's a worry about who will continue to have political and economic influence.”
In fact, the notion of protecting the language has been kicked around almost since the nation's founding. John Adams lobbied(游说)in 1780 for the creation of a national academy to correct and improve the English language. But his proposal died, since lawmakers saw it as a royalist(保皇主义者)attempt to define personal behavior.
Since then, the country hasn't had a national language, but the idea of recognizing the special status of English lived on.
The emotions surrounding language resurface(再次浮现)not because people feel comfortable with English. It is more about the discomfort many Americans feel with the new languages, says Walt Wolfram, a professor at North Carolina State University.
“Language is never about language,” he says.
According to the 2000 US Census Bureau report, of 209 million Americans over 18 years old,172 million speak only English at home. About 37 million speak languages other than English. Among them, 6.5 million speak poor English and 3.1 million don't speak English at all.
What are the two declarations concerned with？
A．The status of the English language.
B．The protection of new languages.
C．The rights to speak one's mother tongue.
D．The improvement of the English language.
第9题
根据短文的内容，回答下列题目
A Debate on the English Language
A measure declaring English the national language is under intense debate in the United States.
The US Senate passed two declarations last week. One calls English the nation&39;s official language and the other says it is the "common and unifying (统一的) " tongue. But Americans found themselves divided on the issue.
Since people worldwide know that most Americans speak only English, many can&39;t understand why the issue is so controversial (有争议的 ) .
"The discussion is related to fears of immigration issues," says Dick Tucker, a social scientist at Pittsburgh&39;s Carnegie Mellon University. "It&39;s related to a worry about the changing demography (入口统计 ) of the US. It&39;s a worry about who will continue to have political and economic influence."
In fact, the notion of protecting the language has been kicked around almost since the nation&39;s founding. John Adams lobbied (游说) in 1780 for the creation of a national academy to correct and improve the English language. But his proposal died, since lawmakers saw it as a royalist (保皇主义者 ) attempt to define personal behavior.
Since then, the country hasn&39;t had a national language, but the idea of recognizing the special status of English lived on.
The emotions surrounding language resurface (再次浮现)not because people feel comfortable with English. It is more about the discomfort many Americans feel with the new languages, says Walt Wolfram, a professor at North Carolina State University.
"Language is never about language," he says.
According to the 2000 US Census Bureau report, of 209 million Americans over 18 years old,172 million speak only English at home. About 37 million speak languages other than English.
Among them,6.5 million speak poor English and 3.1 million don&39;t speak English at all.
What are the two declarations concerned with？ 查看材料
A.The status of the English language.
B.The protection of new languages.
C.The rights to speak one"s mother tongue.
D.The improvement of the English language.
第10题
A sales contract embodies a set of different terms such as quality, quantity, payments, delivery, and insurance, etc. When the exporter and customer are negotiating, they should consider and agree upon these terms. Apparently, each party hopes to stipulate terms favorable for himself. But arrangements which are advantageous to one party are often disadvantageous to the other party. Therefore, some practical suggestions and tactics should be given adequate importance in negotiation of a contract. In this sector, you will have a look on the problems international trade negotiators may face and suggestions in solving them.
Name of goods
It is recommended that the names of goods to be exported correspond to the names used in the customs lists of the importing country, in order to minimize problems at customs, and to facilitate calculation of import duties.
The exporter should be consistent in the names he uses for his products, referring to them precisely as he does in the catalogs he gives to the importers, for the purpose of avoiding any trouble of breach of an agreement for nonconforming goods.
Quantity
In indicating length, weight, volume and so on, the metric system should be used unless the sale is between countries which use another system.
For goods whose quantity could easily decrease during transportation, the biggest issue will be where and when to establish the quantity as a basis of payment and so on. The buyer wants the quantity to be determined upon receipt of the goods at his warehouse, while the seller wants to establish the quantity at the time of shipment at his plant. This issue can be solved only in connection with the closely related issues of risk of loss and insurance.
Quality
An order specifying goods "as per sample" is apt to lead to trouble, because often it is not made clear that a sample is first requested as a basis for future orders, and because it is not always clear just how much deviation from the sample will be tolerated. It is therefore recommended that the quality of goods be specified by specifications or detailed description of samples and that these specifications or descriptions be made a part of the agreement.
Price
The contract price will be closely related to the conditions of delivery, such as FOB, CFR, or CIF. One of these delivery terms will be chosen after consideration of the economic and political factors involved. The problem here is that these terms are not always understood to mean the same thing. For example, in common practice, delivery is deemed completed, and title to the product and the risk of loss pass to the importer, upon shipment. This definition of delivery is called FOB. However, the definition of FOB under Incoterms differs from the definition used in the USA. Therefore, to avoid the problems arising from the different possible meanings of these terms, it is highly recommended that each of these terms, whenever used in an agreement, be defined in it.
A drastic change in the foreign exchange rate could absorb all the profit expected from a transaction or could even cause a deficit. Both parties, therefore, may wish to establish their right to request a price change or to cancel the agreement in such a case. An importer can avoid this risk of foreign exchange rate by insisting on a price in his own country.
Destination
In the event that the destination port is too crowded , and the exporter's ship must wait for many days to enter the port, transportation expense will necessarily be increased. These will be borne by either the exporter or the importer depending upon the agreements made between the two. Even in CIF or CFR contracts, it is possible to provide that the importer will bear any additional port charge. If a port cannot be safely used because of war, the doctrine of force majeure usually excuses a ship from delivering products at the port. In such a case, the exporter should be allowed to deliver the goods at the nearest port possible, especially when the disabling disturbances continue for some time. In general, it is wise for the exporter to set forth in his contract a list of several ports at which the goods may be delivered.
Insurance
The exporter will want insurance to be taken out to cover war risks, strikes, riots, civil commotion, spontaneous combustion, and other risks of this type which are usually exempted from insurance. The exporter will want this coverage to be at the importer's expense, by means of including the insurance premiums in CIF or CFR prices. Both parties should keep in mind that taking out of insurance will be closely related to the contract clause that allocates the risk of loss. A conlract should make clear when and where the risk of loss or damage passes from the exporter to the importer. The exporter then need not worry about loss or damage after the risk has passed to the importer; and the importer need not worry about insurance covering damages that occur before the risk passes to him.
Customs duty
There will be no dispute over the common practice that customs duties are to be paid by the importer. However, the importer will argue that the exporter must pay any additional duties imposed as a result of the exporter's errors as to quantity or price indication, and that the exporter should pay any additional expense due to the exporter's mistake or mishandling.
The exporter will have to accept such an argument by the importer if the importer has provided clear instructions with regard to labeling, documentation, or other specifications affecting customs procedures with which the exporter has not complied.
Questions for reading :
为了保护您的账号安全，请在“赏学吧”公众号进行验证，点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证，验证成功后方可继续查看答案！
微信搜一搜
赏学吧
微信搜一搜
赏学吧
