题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
[主观题]
If motorists do notobserve the traffic regulations, they will be stopped, ticked, and _______.
A.have to pay a fine
B.to pay a fine
C.fined
D.fired
如搜索结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
A.means
B.approach
C.channel
D.access
更多“If motorists do notobserve the…”相关的问题
第1题
辨识句中的一处错误，答案填写Ａ，B，C，D字母。 If motorists do not observe the traffic regulations, they will be stopped, ticketed, A B C and have to pay a fine. D
点击查看答案
第2题
It is reported that 30 percent of the world population have noto clean drinking water and health care（）
点击查看答案
第3题
Little Tips for Law-breaking Motorists in CourtEven a careful motorist may have the misfor
Little Tips for Law-breaking Motorists in Court
Even a careful motorist may have the misfortune to commit a motoring (51) . In due course, (52) a summons (传票) , he will appear in a police court. In the court, the motorist hears his name called by the clerk of the court, and comes forward to identify himself. The magistrate(地方法官) then calls for the policeman who charged the offender and asks him to give evidence. The officer takes the oath to tell the truth, the whole truth and (53) the truth. He also is expected to give an account (54) what happened when the offence was committed and to mention any special circumstances. For instance, the offence (55) partly due to the foolishness of another motorist. It would be unwise for the accused motorist to exaggerate this. It will not help his case to try to blame (56) for his own mistake. The magistrate, (57) hearing that some other motorist is involved, will doubtless say: "What is being done about this man.9 Case coming up later this afternoon, " may (58) be the answer.
(59) you are guilty, it is of course wise to plead guilty and apologize for committing the offence and (60) the court's time. Magistrates are not heartless and a motorist may be lucky enough to hear one say: "There are mitigating circumstances, (61) you have broken the law and I am obliged to (62) a fine. Pay five pounds. Next case. " For many offences if you wish to plead guilty you may do so by post and avoid (63) at all.
Some short-tempered people forget that both policemen and magistrates have a public duty to perform. and are rude to them. This does not pay and rightly so! A magistrate will not let off an offender (64) because he is (65) , but the courteous (有礼貌的) lawbreakers may certainly hope that the magistrate will extend to him what tolerance the law permits.
(51)
A．offence
B．crime
C．mistake
D．accident
第4题
阅读理解：In Britain, the old Road Traffic Act restricted speeds to 2 m.p.h.
In Britain, the old Road Traffic Act restricted speeds to 2 m.p.h. (miles per hour) in towns and 4 m.p.h. in the country. Later Parliament increased the speed limit to 14 m.p.h. But by 1903 the development of the car industry had made it necessary to raise the limit to 20 m.p.h. By 1930, however, the law was so widely ignored that speeding restrictions were done away with altogether. For five years motorists were free to drive at whatever speeds they likes. Then in 1935 the Road Traffic Act imposed a 30 m.p.h. speed limit in built-up areas, along with the introduction of driving tests and pedestrian crossing.
Speeding is now the most common motoring offence in Britain. Offences for speeding fall into three classes: exceeding the limit on a restricted road, exceeding on any road the
limit for the vehicle you are driving, and exceeding the 70 m.p.h. limit on any road. A restricted road is one where the street lamps are 200 yards apart, or more.
The main controversy (争论) surrounding speeding laws is the extent of their safety value. The Ministry of Transport maintains that speed limits reduce accidents. It claims that when the 30 m.p.h. limit was introduced in 1935 there was a fall of 15 percent in fatal accidents. Likewise, when the 40 m.p.h. speed limit was imposed on a number of roads in London in the late fifties, there was a 28 percent reduction in serious accidents. There were also fewer casualties (伤亡) in the year after the 70 m.p.h. motorway limit was imposed in 1966.
In America, however, it is thought that the reduced accident figures are due rather to the increase in traffic density. This is why it has even been suggested that the present speed limits should be done away with completely, or that a guide should be given to inexperienced drivers and the speed limits made advisory, as is done in parts of the USA.
Questions: (注意：答题尽量简短，超过10个词要扣分。每条横线限写一个英语单词，
标点符号不占格。)
71. During which period could British motorists drive without speed limits？
72. What measures were adopted in 1935 in addition to the speeding restrictions？
73. Speeding is a motoring offence a driver commits when he ________.
74. What is the opinion of British authorities concerning speeding laws？
75. What reason do Americans give for the reduction in traffic accidents？
第5题
Voices of argument were ___as the two motorists became more bad－tempered.A.increasedB
Voices of argument were ___as the two motorists became more bad-tempered.
A.increased
B.risen
C.swollen
D.raised
第6题
Voices were ______ as the argument between the two motorists became more bad-tempered.A．sw
Voices were ______ as the argument between the two motorists became more bad-tempered.
A．swollen
B．increased
C．developed
D．raised
第7题
请教：2016英语专八阅读理解练习题一第1题如何解答？
During which period could British motorists drive without speed limits？
第8题
A ___ ____ is a hotel which is for a short stay, usually for a night, for motorists on a long journey.
A.motel
B.hotel
C.hostel
D.homestay
第9题
The sentence "You might tolerate the rude and inconsiderate driver, but nowadays the well
mannered motorist is the exception to the rule." (Para. 1) implies that ______.
点击查看答案
A．our society is unjust towards well-mannered motorists
B．rude drivers can be met only occasionally
C．the well-mannered motorist cannot tolerate the driver
D．nowadays impolite drivers constitute the majority of motorists
第10题
Madrid was hailed as a public health beacon last November when it rolled out ambitious restrictions on the most polluting cars. Seven months and one election day later, a new conservative city council suspended enforcement of the clean air zone, a first step toward its possible demise.Mayor Jose Luis Martinez -Almeida made opposition to the zone a centrepiece of his election campaign, despite its success in improving air quality. A judge has now overruled the city 's decision to stop levying fines, ordering them reinstated. But with legal battles ahead, the zone's future looks uncertain at best.Among other weaknesses, the measures cities must employ when left to tackle dirty air on their own are politically contentious, and therefore vulnerable. That s because they inevitably put the costs of cleaning the air on to individual drivers 一who must pay fees or buy better vehicles 一rather than on to the car manufacturers whose cheating is the real cause of our toxic pollution.It's not hard to imagine a similar reversal happening in London. The new ultra-low emission zone (Ulez) is likely to be a big issue in next year's mayoral election. And if Sadiq Khan wins and extends it to the North and South Circular roads in 2021 as he intends, it is sure to spark intense opposition from the far larger number of motorists who will then be affected.It's not that measures such as London's Ulez are useless. Far from it. Local officials are using the levers that are available to them to safeguard residents' health in the face of a serious threat. The zones do deliver some improvements to air quality, and the science tells us that means real health benefits - fewer heart attacks, strokes and premature births, less cancer, dementia and asthma. Fewer untimely deaths.But mayors and councillors can only do so much about a problem that is far bigger than any one city or town. They are acting because national governments一Britains and others across Europe - have failed to do so.Restrictions that keep highly polluting cars out of certain areas - city centres, school streets", even individual roads - are a response to the absence of a larger effort to properly enforce existing regulations and require auto companies to bring their vehicles into compliance. Wales has introduced special low speed limits to minimise pollution. We re doing everything but insist that manufacturers clean up their cars.
31. Which of the following is true about Madrid's clean air zone? （）
A.Its effects are questionable
B.It has been opposed by a judge
C.It needs tougher enforcement
D.Its fate is yet to be decided
32. Which is considered a weakness of the city-level measures to tackle dirty air? （）
A.They are biased against car manufacturers.
B.They prove impractical for city councils.
C.They are deemed too mild for politicians.
D.They put too much burden on individual motorists.
33. The author believes that the extension of London's Ulez will （）.
A.arouse strong resistance.
B.ensure Khan's electoral success.
C.improve the city s traffic.
D.discourage car manufacturing.
34. Who does the author think should have addressed the problem? （）
A.Local residents
B.Mayors.
C.Councilors.
D.National governments.
35. It can be inferred from the last paragraph that auto companies （）.
A.will raise low-emission car production
B.should be forced to follow regulations
C.will upgrade the design of their vehicles
D.should be put under public supervision
