题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

In the opinion of many Americans and Europeans, we only began to really explore our world

in the sixteenth century. According to them, the sailors of the ancient world did not explore distant parts of the world; they did not have the necessary knowledge or skills for long sea journeys. However, the people who have this opinion are forgetting two important facts of history.

First, sometimes early scientists have an idea which is correct, but scientists in later centuries do not believe it. For example, about 270 B. C., a Greek scientist had an idea which we all believe today: The earth moves around the sun. But for the following 1,600 years scientists did not believe this. In their opinion, the sun clearly moved around the earth. They discovered the truth again only in the fifteenth century!

The second fact of history that many people forget is this: Ancient does not mean primitive. For example, the ancient Egyptians knew a great deal about the stars; they used this knowledge to find their way across the oceans. Two thousand years ago a Greek scientist who lived in Egypt calculated the distance around the earth. The results of his calculations were close to the real distance we know today! So the ancients had a great deal of scientific knowledge. They also had skills which equaled the skills of to- day. For example, 1,300 years ago and before, fishermen in Ireland built their boats of wood and leather. Today some fishermen in Ireland still make boats of the same de- sign. They use tools and materials which are not very different from the tools and materitals which their ancestors used. Why? The ancient design of the boats was good, and with skillful sailors, these boats can sail in all kinds of weather.

Clearly long before the sixteenth century, people had the skill, the knowledge and the equipment which were necessary for long journeys by sea. The world did not have to wait until the sixteenth century for its first explorers!

Which of the following statements is consistent with the passage?

A.According to the writer, we only began to really explore the world in the sixteenth century.

B.In the history of science, people sometimes have to discover a fact a second time.

C.The ancient Egyptians had very little knowledge about the stars.

D.The writer agrees with many Americans and Europeans except for the two facts mentioned in the passage.

查看答案
如搜索结果不匹配,请 联系老师 获取答案
您可能会需要:
您的账号:,可能会需要:
您的账号:
发送账号密码至手机
发送
更多“In the opinion of many America…”相关的问题

第1题

In my opinion, high-IQ students are usually intellectually curious and very good at ma

A.intent

B.extent

C.intend

D.extend

点击查看答案

第2题

(b) ‘opinion shopping’; (5 marks)

(b) ‘opinion shopping’; (5 marks)

点击查看答案

第3题

In my opinion,I think they can not survive.()

In my opinion,I think they can not survive.()

点击查看答案

第4题

(中译英)依我看,你完全错了。(In one’s opinion)

(中译英)依我看,你完全错了。(In one’s opinion)

点击查看答案

第5题

A.perspectiveB.viewsC.opinionD.prospect

A.perspective

B.views

C.opinion

D.prospect

点击查看答案

第6题

One should always _____ facts.

A、base one's opinion on

B、base one's opinion in

C、base one opinion on

D、base one opinion in

点击查看答案

第7题

A. job B. idea C. opinion D. work

A.job

B. idea

C. opinion

D. work

点击查看答案

第8题

An opinion poll is a survey of public opinion on a certain subject().

A.aim at

B.at large

C.based on

D.related to

点击查看答案

第9题

关于审计报告意见,若审计师出具保留意见审计报告书,其英文表达为()。
关于审计报告意见,若审计师出具保留意见审计报告书,其英文表达为()。

A、unqualified opinion

B、qualified opinion

C、disclaimer of opinion

D、adverse opinion

点击查看答案

第10题

opinion()

A.洋葱

B.意见

C.乐观

点击查看答案

第11题

Cooperative competition. Competitive cooperation. Confused? Airline alliances have travele
rs scratching their heads over what' s going on in the skies. Some folks view alliances as a blessing to travelers, offering seamless travel, reduced fares and enhanced frequent-flyer benefits. Others see a conspiracy of big business, causing decreased competition, increased fares and fewer choices. Whatever your opinion, there' s no escaping airline alliances: the marketing hype is unrelenting, with each of the two mega-groupings. One world and Star Alliance, promoting itself as the best choice for all travelers. And, even if you turn away from their ads, chances are they will figure in any of your travel plans. By the end of the year, one world and Star Alliance will between them control more than 40% of the traffic in the sky. Some pundits predict that figure will be more like 75% in 10 years.

But why, after years of often ferocious competition, have airlines decided to band together? Let' s just say the timing is mutually convenient. North American airlines, having exhausted all means of earning customer loyalty at home, have been looking for ways to reach out to foreign flyers. Asian carriers are still burring from the region-wide economic downturn that began two years ago— just when some of the airlines were taking delivery of new aircraft. Alliances also allow carriers to cut costs and increase profits by pooling manpower resources on the ground (rather than each airline maintaining its own ground crew) and code-sharing--the practice of two partners selling tickets and operating only one aircraft.

So alliances are terrific for airlines, but are they good for the passenger? Absolutely, say the airlines: think to the lounges, the joint FFP (frequent flyer programme) benefits, the round-the- world fares, and the global service networks. Then there' s the promise of "seamless" travel: the ability to, say, travel form. Singapore to Rome to New York to Rio de Janiero, all on one ticket, without having to wait hours for connections or worry about your bags. Sounds utopian? Peter Buecking, Cathay Pacific' s director of sales and marketing, thinks that seamless travel is still evolving. "It's fair to say that these links are only in their infancy. The key to seamlessness rests in infrastructure and information sharing. We' re working on this." Henry Ma, spokesperson for Star Alliance in Hong Kong, lists stone of the other benefits for consumers: "Global travelers have an easier time making connections and planning their itineraries." Ma claims alliances also assure passengers consistent service standards.

Critics of alliances say the much-touted benefits to the consumer are mostly pie in the sky, that alliances are all about reducing costs for the airlines, rationalizing services and running joint marketing programmes. Jeff Blyskal, associate editor of Consumer Reports magazine, says the promotional ballyhoo over alliances is much ado about nothing. "I don' t see much of a gain for consumers: alliances are just a marketing gimmick. And as far as seamless travel goes, I' II believe it when I see it. Most airlines can ' t even get their own connections under control, let alone coordinate with another airline."

Blyskal believes alliances will ultimately result in decreased flight choices and increased costs for consumers. Instead of two airlines competing and each operating a flight on the same route at 70% capacity, the allied pair will share the route and ran one full flight. Since fewer seats will be available, passengers will be obliged to pay more for tickets.

The truth about alliances and their merits probably lies somewhere between the travel utopia presented by the players and the evil empires portrayed by their critics. And how much they affect you depends on what kind of traveler you are.

Those who h

A.Delight.

B.Indifference.

C.Objection.

D.Puzzlement.

点击查看答案
发送账号至手机
密码将被重置
获取验证码
发送
温馨提示
该问题答案仅针对搜题卡用户开放,请点击购买搜题卡。
马上购买搜题卡
我已购买搜题卡, 登录账号 继续查看答案
重置密码
确认修改
温馨提示
每个试题只能免费做一次,如需多次做题,请购买搜题卡
立即购买
稍后再说
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“赏学吧”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

微信搜一搜
赏学吧
点击打开微信
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反赏学吧购买须知被冻结。您可在“赏学吧”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
微信搜一搜
赏学吧
点击打开微信